WW2: The course of action of superpowerdom

The Second Globe War gave rise to a multitude of new tips which changed the course of modern society, the notion which has had the greatest influence on the planet as a whole is the idea of the superpower nation. To be a superpower, a nation desires to have a strong economy, an overpowering military, immense international political power, and related to this, a strong national ideology. It was this war (WWII), and its final results that spawned the formation of superpowers and lead them to practical experience such a preponderance of power.

To realize how the Second World War impacted birth of superpowers it is essential to initial have an understanding of and examine the causes of the war. The United States gained its strength in world affairs from its status as an financial power and as a heavily industrialized nation. In the years preceding the war and the Good Depression, America was the world’s biggest producer and arguably had the strongest and most stable economy. In the USSR at the exact same time, Stalin was implementing his ‘five year plans’ to modernize the Soviet economy. From these conditions, related foreign policies resulted from widely divergent origins.

Roosevelt’s isolationism emerged from the wide and prevalent domestic desire to remain neutral in any international conflicts. It was widely believed that America entered the First World War merely in order to save its industry’s capitalist investments in Europe. Whether this is the case or not, Roosevelt was forced to operate with an inherently isolationist Congress, only expanding its horizons soon after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. He signed the Neutrality Act of 1935, generating it illegal for the United States to ship arms to the belligerent governments of any conflict. The act also stated that belligerent nations could buy only non-armaments from the US, and even these had been only to be bought with cash. In contrast, Stalin was by necessity interested in European affairs, but only to the point of concern to the USSR. Russian foreign policy was fundamentally Leninist in its concern to hold the USSR out of war. Stalin wanted to consolidate Communist energy and modernize the country’s business. The Soviet Union was committed to collective action for peace, as long as that commitment did not mean that the Soviet Union would take a brunt of a Nazi attack as a result. Examples of this can be noticed in the Soviet Unions’ attempts to reach a mutual…

Leave a Reply